Drafting formula for non-keeper fantasy success?

Posted by Victor Donge on
After a half of a season, I'm starting to wander if the traditional RB, RB, then QB or WR style of drafting is inferior to going RB, QB, WR, RB or RB, WR, QB, RB. Outside of FADUCO, do you have a team that has a stud RB, stud QB, and stud WR and is doing very well in the league? Like the Cowboys in the early 90s? My sister's team has McNabb, LT, and TO and she leads her league in points. In my minor league, I messed up and should have had Brady, Tiki, and TO, but passed on TO to get a 2nd RB. I'm 4-3-1 in that league, probably would have been 6-2 if I got TO instead of Mike Bell. Having 3 automatic starts helps cut down on inefficiency, but may increase injury risk exposure due to less depth. Any comments?

Comments

Anonymous said…
Sounds like your sister should run your team.
10:28 AM
Anonymous said…
The only mistake was taking Mike Bell in the third. I like the strategy of taking RB, QB, RB, and WR. In FADUCO you might have gotten Peyton with the 2nd pick.

I picked RB1 (Jackson), RB2 (C. Taylor), WR1 (Owens), and WR2 (Roy Williams with the first four picks in that league. I'm quite happy with the results. Luckily I was able to get a stud QB with the 5th pick (McNabb).
11:03 AM
Anonymous said…
It depends on where you draft, but I like the RB,WR,RB,WR,QB order. You can almost always pick up a good QB during the year so' just get 2 with good upside late in the draft (I got Vick in round 11 this year). Tony Romo and Damon Huard prove you can get good production from a waiver wire pickup at QB.
1:53 PM
Post a Comment